mouse anti-prkn (Millipore)
Structured Review
![Complete loss of PINK1 in mouse brain stabilizes <t>PRKN</t> protein while partial loss dampens p-S65-Ub levels. PRKN and p-S65-Ub levels were determined at basal conditions in hemibrain lysates from mice with the following genotypes: WT ( n = 29), heterozygous Prkn +/- ( n = 23), homozygous prkn -/- ( n = 29), heterozygous Pink1 +/- ( n = 15), homozygous pink1 -/- ( n = 22). For better comparison, mice were grouped and analyzed by genotype: WT, prkn -/- , pink1 -/- (left); WT, Prkn +/- , prkn -/- (middle); and WT, Pink1 +/- , pink1 -/- (right). (A) Representative western blots obtained with three different anti-PRKN antibodies <t>(Prk8,</t> 2132, and 5C3) are shown together with the loading control GAPDH. An open arrowhead labels the truncated PRKN-EGFP fusion protein produced in the prkn -/- samples. (B) PRKN (Prk8) protein levels were assessed by densitometry with data points shown as ratio PRKN divided by GAPDH (median ± interquartile range [IQR]). Quantification of PRKN protein using the other two antibodies can be found in Fig. S1A and B. (C) p-S65-Ub levels were quantified by sandwich ELISA with data points shown as median ± IQR. Data was analyzed by using a Kruskal-Wallis test combined with Dunn’s multiple comparison test (***, p < 0.0005; *, p < 0.05). Comparisons to the WT are shown on top of data points, while comparisons between other genotypes are indicated by brackets.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_5862/pmc11135862/pmc11135862__KAUP_A_2286414_F0001_C.jpg)
Mouse Anti Prkn, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-prkn/product/Millipore
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Basal activity of PINK1 and PRKN in cell models and rodent brain"
Article Title: Basal activity of PINK1 and PRKN in cell models and rodent brain
Journal: Autophagy
doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2286414
Figure Legend Snippet: Complete loss of PINK1 in mouse brain stabilizes PRKN protein while partial loss dampens p-S65-Ub levels. PRKN and p-S65-Ub levels were determined at basal conditions in hemibrain lysates from mice with the following genotypes: WT ( n = 29), heterozygous Prkn +/- ( n = 23), homozygous prkn -/- ( n = 29), heterozygous Pink1 +/- ( n = 15), homozygous pink1 -/- ( n = 22). For better comparison, mice were grouped and analyzed by genotype: WT, prkn -/- , pink1 -/- (left); WT, Prkn +/- , prkn -/- (middle); and WT, Pink1 +/- , pink1 -/- (right). (A) Representative western blots obtained with three different anti-PRKN antibodies (Prk8, 2132, and 5C3) are shown together with the loading control GAPDH. An open arrowhead labels the truncated PRKN-EGFP fusion protein produced in the prkn -/- samples. (B) PRKN (Prk8) protein levels were assessed by densitometry with data points shown as ratio PRKN divided by GAPDH (median ± interquartile range [IQR]). Quantification of PRKN protein using the other two antibodies can be found in Fig. S1A and B. (C) p-S65-Ub levels were quantified by sandwich ELISA with data points shown as median ± IQR. Data was analyzed by using a Kruskal-Wallis test combined with Dunn’s multiple comparison test (***, p < 0.0005; *, p < 0.05). Comparisons to the WT are shown on top of data points, while comparisons between other genotypes are indicated by brackets.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Western Blot, Produced, Sandwich ELISA
Figure Legend Snippet: PINK1 gene dosage affects p-S65-Ub and PRKN levels in PD patients’ cells. Primary skin fibroblasts from related individuals without (QQ; n = 2), with one (QX; n = 3) or with two (XX; n = 2) mutant PINK1 Q456X alleles were either left untreated (0 h, left) or were treated for 2 h (middle) or 8 h (right) with 1 µM valinomycin (Val). Data is arranged by treatment groups (i.e., time points). (A) Cell lysates were analyzed by western blot using antibodies against PINK1, PRKN, and the loading control VCL (vinculin). (B) Protein levels of PINK1 were quantified by sandwich ELISA. (C) PRKN protein levels were derived by densitometry of the western blots and data points shown as a ratio of PRKN divided by VCL and normalized to PINK1 XX . (D) p-S65-Ub levels were also quantified by sandwich ELISA. Data is shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean of biological replicates, grouped by allele count of the Q456X mutation, and analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (***, p < 0.0005; **, p < 0.005; *, p < 0.05). For untreated the mean of 4 technical repeats per biological sample is shown. Asterisks on top of data points indicate individual comparison to WT controls without PINK1 mutation.
Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Sandwich ELISA, Derivative Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Cell type-specific expression of PINK1 and PRKN in fibroblasts, iPSCs, and midbrain DA neurons drive p-S65-Ub levels. Primary skin fibroblasts from either a control or patient with PINK1 I368N mutation, and undifferentiated iPS cells that were generated from the same PINK1 I368N patient cells and their gene-corrected counterparts (isogenic WT), as well as DA neurons generated from the same iPSC set were treated with 1 µM valinomycin (Val) for the indicated times and harvested. (A) Representative western blots show levels of PINK1, PRKN, p-S65-Ub and MFN2 for all three cell lines. VCL (vinculin) and DA neuronal markers, TUBB3/βIII-tubulin and TH (tyrosine hydroxylase), were used as loading controls. (B) Quantification of PINK1 protein levels by sandwich ELISA. (C) Densitometric analysis of PRKN western blots shown under (A) and data points displayed as PRKN divided by VCL or PRKN divided by DA neuronal markers. (D) Quantification of p-S65-Ub levels measured by sandwich ELISA. (E) Densitometric analysis of MFN2. Relative modification of MFN2 was calculated as the ratio of upper (ubiquitinated) to lower (unmodified) MFN2 band. The mean of three independent experiments for each cell type ± SD is shown. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni correction. (***, p < 0.0005; **, p < 0.005; *, p < 0.05). Asterisks on top of data points indicate individual comparison to respective WT controls without PINK1 mutation.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Mutagenesis, Generated, Western Blot, Sandwich ELISA, Modification, Comparison

